Record the relied-upon facts
Store the resolved entity, evidence fields, source and time used by the original agent decision.
AI AGENT EVIDENCE MONITORING
Keep AI-agent company decisions current.
Ground the answer before action.
Monitor the company evidence behind agent decisions and trigger re-review when registry-backed facts materially change.
START WITHResolved company + relied-upon evidenceREVIEWMaterial change event + agent trigger
Design the agent around evidence and policy.Define the agent host, tool scope, countries, evidence fields, exceptions and permitted actions.
WHEN TO USE IT
Stop an agent from treating yesterday’s company evidence as permanently current.
Give the agent a structured entity result, provenance and explicit exception state. Keep the evidence it relied upon beside the answer or action.
- An agent’s approval or recommendation remains active after the initial check.
- Company status, address, identifiers or ownership-related changes should reopen a case.
- A system needs event-driven review rather than repeatedly querying every company record.
THE WORKFLOW
Four steps. One clear result boundary.
Define material events
Choose which company changes invalidate, weaken or simply annotate the existing decision.
Deliver the change
Send a structured event to the agent, workflow engine, queue or case-management system.
Re-ground the decision
Retrieve current evidence, compare the change and record whether the prior outcome remains valid.
WHAT YOU CAN REVIEW
The record, not just the number.
Fields vary by country and company. VATFind labels absent information instead of inventing a result.
- 01Monitored entity
- The stable legal-company record associated with the original decision.
- 02Changed attribute
- Previous and current value for the material company event.
- 03Event provenance
- Source and timing context needed to review the change.
- 04Affected decision
- The agent answer, approval or workflow state that relied on the changed fact.
- 05Re-review outcome
- Confirmed, amended, escalated or withdrawn state after fresh evidence is considered.
READ THE RESULT CORRECTLY
Monitoring must be tied to the facts the agent actually used.
A generic company update is not automatically material. The workflow must define which fields, sources, event thresholds and decision types require re-grounding or human review.
Review data and limitationsCOMMON QUESTIONS
Before you implement the workflow.
These answers define how the agent should use company evidence, handle ambiguity and stay inside policy.